- Home
- World Views
- Festivals
- Teachers
- Big Questions
- Dialogue
- Stuff
- Topic Material
- About us
- Tutorial Plans
- Confused?
- Log in
A Hindu Perspective on Judgement and Salvation
Submitted by AFAN team member Seeta Lakhani a Hindu on 12/11/2008 19:41
Tags Associated with article
Tags Associated with article
Law of Karma and Reincarnation
How can an all-compassionate
God dish out punishment? Hindus could not accept this idea. Hence
a God sitting in judgement was never accepted by the Hindus. Judgement
came about through an impersonal law called the Law of Karma. It was
recognised that what we set into motion has a habit of producing consequences
that catch up with us sooner or later. This seems like a reasonable
proposition, but Hindus claim that sometimes the consequences of what
we set into motion will catch up with us in our next life. Ideas of
law of karma and reincarnation are thus inextricably linked with each
other. In the last forty years the concept of reincarnation has been
well investigated at the University of Virginia and sits well as a scientifically
verified theory. Even if one were to believe in reincarnation, the question
arises: ‘How can the Law of Karma catch up with an individual in his
or her next life?’ The answer is that the individual carries the seeds
of his activities in his mental make-up which will resurface in his
or her next life. So for example if a liar or a thief was never caught
in one life, they will exhibit the same habits in their next life where
they would more than likely get caught and punished.
Salvation
One of the scriptures of authority
of the Hindu scripture the Kathopanisahd
expresses well the evolution of Hindu ideas of the hereafter, judgement
and salvation. The initial concept visible in the Hindu tradition was
that of carrying out certain righteous and ritualistic practices to
achieve rewards in heaven. But this idea was seen as over-simplistic
and soon transcended. The idea of living in heaven for a long period
where one enjoys pleasure alone was seen as naïve. Pleasure and pain
are relative concepts so what is pleasurable for sometime, will become
less pleasurable in due course. It was recognised that without pain,
pleasure will soon lose its potency. Hence the idea of living in heaven
was seen as a fickle condition. The resolution of the human condition
was seen as recognising our essential nature not what we think we are
i.e. body and mind complex but what we truly are: spirit.
Until we recognise our essential nature as the spirit we are destined
to be reborn – this became a key concept of samsara
(reincarnation) in Hinduism. The Kathopanishad ends with a cutting
comment that ‘ the knowing Self is no longer born nor does it die.’
This state is described as moksha
literally meaning end of delusion about our nature as spirit rather
than the body & mind complex we inhabit.

Post new comment